The development of the global economy has resulted in more frequent travel to foreign countries by people around the world. While international marriages used to be uncommon, today they are nothing unusual. Millions of people travel or move to other countries, develop relationships and marry. Unfortunately, obtaining an international divorce is not such a simple matter.
One of the biggest problems you might face in trying to obtain an international divorce involves obtaining the consent of your spouse. In some cases, spouses agree a legal divorce is what’s needed to move on with their lives. Once divorced, individuals regain their single status for tax filing purposes. If one or the other wants to start a business, a divorce could be advantageous, and it’s a necessity if either spouse wants to remarry. When both spouses are in agreement about the divorce, it’s considered a bilateral divorce.
In many cases however, a bilateral divorce is not possible. If you or your spouse have lived in one or more different countries since separating, it’s possible you’re out of contact. In some cases, losing contact is deliberate, as in the case of a spouse who’s trying to avoid paying child support or alimony. In other cases, it just happens.
Establishing a career in this new economy could be a hard job. It is best to do more than what you can to land a job as the employment competition around is very tight. Nonetheless, the economy isn’t always stable, and when recession sets in, businesses will be pushed to lay off several employees. Needless to say, business abuses are present anywhere particularly in New York. The truth is, it can’t be helped that several workplaces are discriminating the jobless with the number of people looking for a job. /p>
There are different things that can affect a person’s chances of getting hired. Cronyism can be one. Individuals with connections can certainly get the job, while those who are at the bottom are working their best to stay afloat. In fact, many New Yorkers are not having troubles finding properties; but they’re more worried about job declines. The slow progress in the job gains confirms it all. Moreover, job security adds to the problems of many workers.
Navigating the modern workplace is very tough that is why you need the help of employment lawyers NYC. They can help employees from large companies, small businesses and nonprofit organizations about employment and civil litigation matters. Usually, their services aren’t just limited to the local community because they give it internationally too. They do know about how a few workplaces discriminate their employees’ race, age, sex, disability and religion. With their help, workers will have better chances of keeping their job without being stereotyped.
Courts make determinations in law and in equity. By ‘in law’ is meant following a specific law – constitutional law, state law, etc. By ‘in equity’ is meant determining what is ‘fair’ to do where now law specifically rules. An example is determining how to distribute the assets in a divorce among the husband and wife.
Common law refers to the myriad of decisions made by judges and appeals courts. Maxims of Common Law are ‘guiding truths’. Adhering to them helps judges make fairer decisions. They’re ignored in family court determinations since fairness is a wholly secondary issue. This article overviews what these maxims are.
Maxims are absolutely essential to the preservation of rights and fair treatment to all litigants. Maxims:
A lot of people have expressed concern about the prepaid legal plans that have gained popularity and how they may be scams. These prepaid legal services scams have fell into the good graces of more than 1 and a half million families in Canada and the U.S. This scam has also allowed people that have taken advantage of prepaid legal services business plans to become quite wealthy too.
The scam that peddles a prepaid legal service got its start in America back in the decade of the 70’s and its founder said that it would help lawyers the same way medical insurance helped doctors. This scam wasn’t new to society though because a less sophisticated version, which was said to have influenced the latest one, was the rage as early as the 1930’s in Europe.
Let’s Breakdown the Prepaid Legal Scam Here
Recently, a lot of uncertainty has been circling around the issue of whether or not it should be legal to jailbreak 3G phones. “Jailbreaking” is now the common slang term for hacking into a Verizon iPhone, allowing users to run applications on the Apple OS that are not licensed or authorized by the Apple corporation. Confusion has now been cleared up by DMCA regulators, who have reached a consensus, which basically states that there is no unfair use attributed to the user who makes modifications to his or her iPhone, thereby making it operable with applications not approved by Apple.
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) is a U.S. Copyright law that makes it criminal to produce or propagate technology used to hedge digital rights management (DRM) which limit access to works that are copyrighted. However, the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has requested that the jailbreak Verizon phone be added to a list of specific exemptions that will ultimately not be applied to this act. The EFF contends that the iPhone’s integration protection system is purely a strategic business decision, bent on preventing competition. The EFF also maintains that jailbreaking represents fair use of the firmware linked to the operating system.
This new revelation comes at the expense of Apple, which has profited on a closed business model, introduced in 2007 when the iPhone debuted. While Apple has stated in the past that is not legal to jailbreak, to this date no action, legal or otherwise, has been taken against the untold numbers of iPhone users who have hacked into their phones to use Cyndia, an underground application store.
Apple has currently sold in excess of three billion applications, and emphatically states that its closed model has been the key to the iPhone’s success. Apple executives feel that other cellular phone networks could likewise be victim to devastating cyber attacks by iPhone users worldwide if they are permitted to legally break into their devices.
Proposed exemptions to the DMCA are brought up for review every three years. From Apple’s perspective, the DMCA should protect the encryption (which is copyrighted) and included in the start up of the iPhone OS. However, the Copyright Office came to a different conclusion – that instead, the restrictions that a copyright owner might impose upon an OS are not covered under a law meant to criminalize the violation of those restrictions.
Cydia, the forbidden application marketplace, can currently boast about nine million iPhones having the app installed. This news, naturally, comes as a great relief to the folks at Cydia and other alternative (but not sanctioned) applications written for installation and function on the iPhone (such as Rock Your Phone, which sells an app that enables the iPhone to become Wi-Fi hotspot.) The jailbreak community at large feels that this decision has given it legitimacy.
In response, Apple states that modification of the iPhone OS can lead to the inception of work which is a violation, yet protected by copyright law – and that the applicable license on the OS prohibits any software alterations. In addition (and not surprisingly) Apple has found that the unauthorized modifications are to be blamed for OS instabilities and other technical issues. Henceforth, they have explicitly stated that such alterations will void the iPhone warranty.